AsoLocaleApple-only and Google-only orders share the same one-time pricing baseline
Single-store work starts from the same one-locale pricing and delivery model, so the main difference is storefront destination rather than a second quote system.
Shared Comparison proof route
Store Scope Comparison that makes Apple, Google, and both-store tradeoffs visible before checkout.
This route compares the real storefront combinations already supported by pricing and delivery so buyers can choose scope before requesting a quote.
Single-store baseline
USD 89 for one locale
Both-store baseline
USD 102
Express option
2 days with +25% express surcharge
Publish support
Apple after review on Apple or both-store scope
Comparison proof route
How store scope comparison clarifies Apple, Google, and both-store scope.
This route compares the real storefront combinations already supported by pricing and delivery so buyers can choose scope before requesting a quote.
Both-store scope stays explicit instead of hidden inside checkout
Combined delivery applies the same published multiplier everywhere the product talks about pricing, which makes the upgrade inspectable before buyers configure their order.
Publish expectations stay truthful per store combination
Apple or both-store orders can unlock Apple publish after review, while Google-only delivery stays inside the same production workflow without Apple publish controls.
Freshness marker
The comparison route stays reviewed against the published store-scope options.
This block shows that Apple-only, Google-only, and both-store distinctions were checked against the current pricing and delivery contract instead of drifting into route-local comparison copy.
Authoritative sources
These public sources back the store-scope comparison route.
The comparison page cites the product’s own pricing and deliverables routes plus the official platform documentation that defines the two storefront contexts.
Public source
AsoLocale store scope comparison
Public comparison source for Apple-only, Google-only, and both-store choices.
Review sourcePublic source
AsoLocale pricing
Public pricing source for one-time USD quotes, store combinations, and delivery modifiers.
Review sourcePublic source
AsoLocale deliverables
Public deliverables source for localized metadata scope, QA expectations, and storefront-aware handoff.
Review sourcePublic source
Apple App Store Connect overview
Official Apple documentation for App Store submission, management, and storefront workflows.
Review sourcePublic source
Google Play Console Help: Create your store listing
Official Google Play documentation for store listing setup and public metadata requirements.
Review sourceQuestion-led answers
The comparison route answers the scope-selection questions buyers ask before pricing.
These answers keep store choice explicit and citeable instead of leaving buyers to infer scope from pricing alone.
Question-led answer
When should a team choose Apple-only scope?
Apple-only scope fits iOS-first launches that want publish-ready support after review without carrying Google Play work in the same order.
Question-led answer
What changes with Google-only scope?
Google-only teams keep the same intake, localization, and QA workflow, but the route does not promise Apple publish controls on that scope.
Question-led answer
When does both-store scope make sense?
Both-store scope is for teams that want one localization brief and one delivery contract across Apple App Store and Google Play, with the published multiplier staying visible before checkout.
Comparison contract
Three route-owned options explain when each store scope fits.
The comparison route is the shared Comparison proof: it keeps Apple-only, Google-only, and both-store scope visible as truthful public choices tied to the same pricing and delivery facts.
Comparison option
Apple App Store
Choose Apple-only scope when the release plan centers on iOS and the team wants publish-ready support after review without carrying Google Play work in the same order.
Best for: iOS-first launches that want Apple publish readiness
- One-locale baseline
- USD 89
- Delivery
- 3 days standard / 2 days express
- Publish
- Apple publish after review available
Comparison option
Google Play
Choose Google-only scope when Android is the only storefront in play and the team needs the same multilingual production flow without Apple-specific publish steps.
Best for: Android-only launches or phased Google Play expansions
- One-locale baseline
- USD 89
- Delivery
- 3 days standard / 2 days express
- Publish
- No Apple publish controls on Google-only scope
Comparison option
Both stores
Choose combined-store scope when the team wants one brief and one delivery contract for Apple App Store and Google Play together.
Best for: Teams launching both storefronts from one localization brief
- One-locale baseline
- USD 102
- Multiplier
- +15% both-store multiplier
- Fastest example
- USD 128 in 2 days
Route-specific scope framing
The comparison route turns store choice into a visible decision, not a hidden pricing toggle.
This page exists to compare real scope options on the public graph. It sits between workflow, pricing, and deliverables so buyers can decide what they actually need before they configure a quote.
Apple-only stays publish-focused
This route keeps Apple App Store scope tied to publish readiness after review instead of hiding that distinction inside pricing copy.
Google-only keeps the same production path
Android-only teams still use the same intake, localization, and QA workflow without carrying Apple-specific publish expectations.
Both-store scope stays visibly upgraded
The shared multiplier and fastest-delivery example stay inspectable on-page so combined scope never looks like an invisible checkout toggle.
Related pages
Move from store scope comparison into the next route.
Use the graph-owned anchors “See pricing by store scope”, “Understand the workflow”, “Review deliverables”, “Back to home” to keep the comparison route connected to pricing, workflow, and deliverables.
Ready to price your chosen scope?
Open pricing.
Once buyers pick the right store combination, the shared CTA returns them to pricing or deliverables without breaking the graph-backed journey.